tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4890190378513599935.post3307123716511745851..comments2013-09-22T08:23:41.317-07:00Comments on RealReal Science: Steven vs TrendsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4890190378513599935.post-15034987170470408102013-09-22T08:23:41.317-07:002013-09-22T08:23:41.317-07:00The daily mail was so ambiguous as to where it eve...The daily mail was so ambiguous as to where it even got the 60% figure from. The NSDIC august average was a guess on my part (it is something the daily mail should not have forced me to do). I wish they would just reference it, if they had I would have been more confident to do the technical fact checking! Adminhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14644736681219948276noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4890190378513599935.post-69129416234343896592013-09-20T10:59:25.795-07:002013-09-20T10:59:25.795-07:00The 60% wasn't even true, Bob Ward from the Gr...The 60% wasn't even true, Bob Ward from the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment states;<br /><br />"the NSIDC confirmed to me yesterday that the main figure used by Rose for his article was mistyped and that the mistake was corrected on 10 September, showing that Arctic sea extent in August 2013 was only 29 per cent higher than was recorded for the same month last year."<br /><br />http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/Media/Commentary/2013/Sept/humiliating-mistakes-mail-on-sunday.aspxLazarushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14139033650731770470noreply@blogger.com